Everything in life can be seen through this lens of evolving thing processes. Economic and political governance structures, for example. Since systems are constantly evolving, there is little point in resisting any particular system at any given time. It is best to steer these systems into the evolutionary spiral by honestly acknowledging their positive and negative functional aspects and deciding our policies with unbiased clarity. Opposition is a motivated attempt to freeze these systems – by ignoring the negative or exaggerating the positive and adopting a pro- or anti-narrative stance based on half-truths or misinformation. It is not a way to inhabit a higher sphere of logic and use this higher logic to circumvent the lies imposed by an existing power. In other words, being oppositional prevents tactically navigating a restricted system by inhabiting and expressing a higher level of consciousness that encompasses a definition of freedom processes and sometimes moves through static parameters called laws or rules. Deviant must know how to inhabit the rough gray area between black and white contrasts and use this ill-defined terrain as a playground. While it may seem silly to set rules to break the rules, deviation is not a tacit promotion of anarchy. And to be clear, you can deviate without breaking any laws or rules. Maybe you`re just breaking with absurd social norms.
Specifically, the five principles of ethical deviation function as a set of overlapping criteria or vaguely defined boundaries to help dissidents follow a true path through deviation. These principles also help define what the gap is not. It is not an attitude to be embraced, nor a way to express poorly motivated acts. After all, being ethical is not the same as „everything society accepts.“ In any society, most people accept standards that are truly ethical. But norms of behavior in society may differ from what is ethical. An entire society can become ethically corrupt. Nazi Germany is a good example of a morally corrupt society. Like Baumhart`s first responder, many people tend to equate ethics with their feelings.
But being ethical clearly doesn`t mean following your feelings. A person who follows their feelings may be reluctant to do the right thing. In fact, feelings often deviate from what is ethical. Living with a free spirit and a free spirit is troubling for today`s society. The standards of conduct imposed permeate the entire spectrum of society. Even quirks are standardized. Whether you`re an accountant, preacher, or poet, there`s a standard you can deviate from. Anyone can be a deviant. Deviant(s): someone who deviates from an established course or accepted norm; The one who adheres to the ethics of the deviant when he takes the struggle of the deviant. (See the deviant`s dictionary) Second, ethics refers to the study and development of one`s ethical standards. As mentioned above, feelings, laws, and social norms can deviate from what is ethical.
It is therefore necessary to constantly review its standards to ensure that they are reasonable and robust. Thus, ethics also means the constant effort to study our own moral beliefs and behaviors, and to ensure that we and the institutions we help shape meet reasonable and healthy standards. The recognition that all things exist simultaneously as evolutionary processes and that all processes are things at the same time. As an individual, I exist here and now. But I also exist as a continually edited and revised narrative of self; Fluid movement of unknown origin at an unknown endpoint. The purpose of deviation for those who engage in the struggle of the deviant is to inspire the fluid narrative of the self on an increasingly free and autonomous trajectory. Non-opposition is a form of resistance or circumvention of an authority whose basic methodology is based on the definition of a new terrain of „conflict“. It rejects the fundamental logic of an existing regime, not as something invalid or non-existent, but as a logic that does not apply to the unopposed group or individual. Non-opposition is a process of defining and implementing new procedural logics in a space already occupied by an existing regime. It is essential for the act to deviate from the norm, to deviate from the norm, and thus to refuse to strengthen the power of government from which one departs both from within and within.
Although they occur on the terrain of a governmental power, deviation is a method of ignoring the procedural logic of that governmental power. Non-opposition is therefore a way to live as a stranger at home. This is the essence of deviation – moving forward without going against it. The rebels are going against him. Dissidents pass. Deviation: Deviation from an established path or accepted norm, but doing so in accordance with the five principles of ethical deviation is non-violent. In addition to the outsourced risks inherent in daily activities such as driving on busy roads, deviations involving risky behaviours must include these additional risks for the deviants concerned. Respect for the property of others is also a form of non-violence.
Violent acts against another person`s property – physically, mentally or spiritually – are an expression of violence against that person. While there may be real-time situations where violence, theft, or property damage are required, perhaps even noble actions, these situations go to extremes beyond the scope of deviation. Being ethical is also not the same as following the law. The law often contains ethical standards to which most citizens subscribe. But laws, like feelings, can deviate from what is ethical. Our own pre-civil war slavery laws and South Africa`s apartheid laws today are grotesquely obvious examples of laws that deviate from what is ethical. The ultimate goal is self-government; A civilization composed of autonomous individuals who do not want to commit the acts of theft, violence and dishonesty that serve to justify the existence of a sovereign government (which commits these acts in its place). Instead of top-down laws, self-government is the point where governance is internalized.
However, it is not internalized as a form of obedient governmentality. It is the result of liberated individuals who make instant decisions shaped by a deep knowledge of whether or not the effects of these actions contribute to the greater good, and are willing to pay the personal price if they do not. To quote Henry David Thoreau, some suggest that ethical action is the one that best protects and respects the moral rights of those affected. This approach is based on the conviction that man has a dignity based on his human nature in himself or on his ability to freely choose what he does with his life. On the basis of this dignity, they have the right to be treated as an end in itself and not only as a means to other ends. The list of moral rights – including the right to make one`s own decisions about what kind of life to lead, to be told the truth, not to be harmed, to some extent of privacy, etc. – is widely debated; Some argue that non-humans also have rights. Rights are often understood as duties – especially the duty to respect the rights and dignity of others. So what is ethics? Ethics are two different things. First, ethics refers to well-established standards of right and wrong that dictate what people should do, usually in terms of rights, duties, benefits to society, fairness, or certain virtues. Ethics, for example, refers to norms that impose reasonable obligations to refrain from rape, theft, murder, assault, defamation and fraud.
Ethical standards also include those that prescribe virtues such as honesty, compassion, and loyalty. And ethical standards include standards relating to rights such as the right to life, the right to be free from injury, and the right to privacy. These standards are appropriate ethical standards because they are supported by consistent and well-founded reasons. To maintain deviation as a positive pursuit, one must possess both honesty – the quality of being honest or sincere – and truthfulness – the fact of being realistic or realistic.
